Muccione, V. et al. Adaptation pathways for effective responses to climate change risks. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.-climate ch. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.883 (2024).
Google Scholar
Xin, D. et al. Do innovation in environmental-related technologies asymmetrically affect carbon dioxide emissions in the United States?. Technol. Soc. 67, 101761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101761 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dong, J. et al. Can corporate digital innovation speed up climate change mitigation? Evidence From China. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 71, 7797–7814. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2024.3386181 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chang, K. W. et al. The impact of green technology innovation on carbon dioxide emissions: The role of local environmental regulations. J. Environ. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117990 (2023).
Google Scholar
Peng, H., Shen, N., Liao, H., Xue, H. & Wang, Q. Uncertainty factors, methods, and solutions of closed-loop supply chain — A review for current situation and future prospects. J. Clean. Prod. 254, 120032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120032 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tanthanongsakkun, S., Treepongkaruna, S. & Jiraporn, P. Carbon emissions, corporate governance, and staggered boards. Bus. Strat. Environ. 32(1), 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3174 (2022).
Google Scholar
Perdichizzi, S., Buchetti, B., Cicchiello, A. F. & Dal Maso, L. Carbon emission and firms’ value: Evidence from Europe. Energy Econ. 131, 107324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107324 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gonenc, H. & Krasnikova, A. V. Board gender diversity and voluntary carbon emission disclosure. Sustainability https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114418 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chen, S., Mao, H. & Sun, J. Low-carbon city construction and corporate carbon reduction performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. J. Bus. Eth. 2021, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04886-1 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chen, P. Y. Corporate social responsibility, financing constraints, and corporate carbon intensity: New evidence from listed Chinese companies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25176-5 (2023).
Google Scholar
Vecchiato, R., Do, H., Pierrakis, Y. & Blackburn, R. Innovation and foresight in SMEs: Lessons from the case of UK digital health companies. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 71, 1655–1668. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3336732 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dwivedi, Y. K. et al. Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 63, 102456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102456 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, Z., Huang, Z. & Su, Y. New media environment, environmental regulation and corporate green technology innovation: Evidence from China. Energy Econ. 119, 106545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106545 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sun, Y. Chinas target responsibility system and convergence of CO2 emissions. Singapore Econ. Rev. 63(2), 431–445 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hu, S. et al. Voluntary environmental regulations, greenwashing and green innovation: Empirical study of China’s ISO14001 certification. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 102, 107224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107224 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Jiang, S., Lim, K. Y. & Morris, D. Corporate “Greening” and innovation: A reinterpretation based on historical immortals. Bus. Strategy. Environ. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4105 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Riaz, M. & Yang, X. Modeling the linkage between climate-tech, energy transition, and CO2 emissions: Do environmental regulations matter?. Gondwana Res. 127, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.003 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wolde-Rufael, Y. & Mulat-Weldemeskel, E. Effectiveness of environmental taxes and environmental stringent policies on CO2 emissions: The European experience. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 25(6), 5211–5239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02262-1 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kou, P., Han, Y., Jin, B. & Li, T. How informal environmental regulations constrain carbon dioxide emissions under pollution control and carbon reduction: Evidence from China. Environ. Res. 252, 118732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118732 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gu, G. et al. Does carbon financial market as an environmental regulation policy tool promote regional energy conservation and emission reduction? Empirical evidence from China. Energy Policy 163, 112826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112826 (2022).
Google Scholar
Xiao, B. et al. The impacts of environmental tax in China: A dynamic recursive multi-sector CGE model. Energies 8(8), 7777–7804. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8087777 (2015).
Google Scholar
Liao, N., Luo, X. & He, Y. Could environmental regulation effectively boost the synergy level of carbon emission reduction and air pollutants control? Evidence from industrial sector in China. Atmospheric Pollut. Res. 15(8), 102173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2024.102173 (2024).
Google Scholar
Khan, Z. et al. Environmental regulations an option: Asymmetry effect of environmental regulations on carbon emissions using non-linear ARDL. Energy Sour. Part a-Recover. Utilization Environ. Eff. 41(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018.1504145 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sinn, H. W. Public policies against global warming: A supply side approach. Int. Tax Public Finance 15, 360–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9082-z (2008).
Google Scholar
Smulders, S., Tsur, Y. & Zemel, A. Announcing climate policy: Can a green paradox arise without scarcity?. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 64(9), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1742789 (2012).
Google Scholar
Van Der Ploeg, F. & Withagen, C. Is there really a green paradox?. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 64(3), 342–363. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1562463 (2012).
Google Scholar
WangWel, H. W. Coordinating technological progress and environmental regulation in CO2 mitigation: Theoptimal levels for OECD countries&emerging economies. Energy Econ. 87, 104510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104510 (2019).
Google Scholar
Baloch, M. A. & Danish, F. N. M. CO2 emissions in BRICS countries: What role can environmental regulation and financial development play?. Clim. Ch. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03362-7 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cao, Y., Ren, W. & Yue, L. Environmental regulation and carbon emissions: New mechanisms in game theory. Cities 149, 104945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104945 (2024).
Google Scholar
Guo, W. & Chen, Y. Assessing the efficiency of China’s environmental regulation on carbon emissions based on Tapio decoupling models and GMM models. Energy Rep. 4, 713–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2018.10.007 (2018).
Google Scholar
Xu, B. Environmental regulations, technological innovation, and low carbon transformation: A case of the logistics industry in China. J. Clean. Prod. 439, 140710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140710 (2024).
Google Scholar
Aydin, C. & Esen, Ö. Reducing CO2 emissions in the EU member states: Do environmental taxes work?. J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 61, 2396–2420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1395731 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rennings, K. Redefining innovation—eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 32(2), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3 (2000).
Google Scholar
Behera, P. & Sethi, N. Nexus between environment regulation, FDI, and green technology innovation in OECD countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29(35), 52940–52953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19458-7 (2022).
Google Scholar
Pan, X. et al. The cleaner production technology innovation effect of environmental regulation policy: Evidence from China. Manage. Environ. Qual. Int. J. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-10-2020-0227 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ye, Z., Li, C. H. & Yao, L. Impact of environmental regulations on the innovation of SMEs: Evidence from China. Environ. Technol. Innov. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101515 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Xia, C. & Xia, Y. Dynamic relationship between environmental regulation and energy consumption structure in China under spatiotemporal heterogeneity. Sci. Total Environ. 738, 140364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140364 (2020).
Google Scholar
Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Bengochea-Morancho, A. & Morales-Lage, R. Does environmental policy stringency foster innovation and productivity in OECD countries?. Energy Policy 134, 110982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110982 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yan, Z., Yu, Y., Du, K. & Zhang, N. How does environmental regulation promote green technology innovation? Evidence from China’s total emission control policy. Ecol. Econ. 219, 108137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108137 (2024).
Google Scholar
Leeuwen, G. V. & Mohnen, P. Revisiting the Porter hypothesis: An empirical analysis of Green innovation for the Netherlands. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 26(1 2), 63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2016.1202521 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kneller, R. & Manderson, E. Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries. Resour. Energy Econ. 34(2), 211–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.12.001 (2012).
Google Scholar
Fang, Y. & Shao, Z. Whether green finance can effectively moderate the green technology innovation effect of heterogeneous environmental regulation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19(6), 3646. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063646 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gao, Y., Ning, J. & Zhang, M. An evolutionary game dynamic analysis of enterprise technological innovation implementation strategy: From the perspective of green bonds. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 71, 11551–11564. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2024.3425951 (2024).
Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. & van der Linde, C. Toward a new conception of the environment— Competitiveness relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 9(4), 97–118 (1995).
Google Scholar
Cainelli, G., D’Amato, A. & Mazzanti, M. Resource efficient eco-innovations for a circular economy: Evidence from EU firms. Res. Policy. 49(1), 10382 (2019).
Google Scholar
Nazir, R., Gillani, S. & Shafiq, M. N. Realizing direct and indirect impact of environmental regulations on pollution: A path analysis approach to explore the mediating role of green innovation in G7 economies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25399-6 (2023).
Google Scholar
Manu, E. K., Chen, G. S. & Adomako, S. Do environmental regulations and technological innovation enhance environmental well-being in sub-Saharan Africa?. Bus. Strat. Environ. 33(6), 5736–5752. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3772 (2024).
Google Scholar
Khurshid, A., Cifuentes-Faura, J., Ying, H. & Saleem, S. F. Corporate social responsibility in the era of government subsidies: A novel empirical perspective on market competitiveness. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manage. 32(1), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2938 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wenqi, D., Khurshid, A., Rauf, A. & Calin, A. C. Government subsidies’ influence on corporate social responsibility of private firms in a competitive environment. J. Innov. Knowl. 7(2), 100189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100189 (2022).
Google Scholar
Khurshid, A., Hongbin, Y., Cifuentes-Faura, J. & Saleem, S. F. Does corporate social responsibility and environmental governance drive green innovation?. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manage. 32(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2942 (2025).
Google Scholar
Fan, H. & Liang, C. Effective government and regional technological innovation: Evidence from 284 Cities in China. Regul. Gov. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12649 (2024).
Google Scholar
Borsatto, J. M. L. S. & Amui, L. B. L. Green innovation: Unfolding the relation with environmental regulations and competitiveness. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 149, 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.06.005 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ren, X., Li, Y., Shahbaz, M., Dong, K. & Lu, Z. Climate risk and corporate environmental performance: Empirical evidence from China. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 30, 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.023 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhang, D. Environmental regulation, green innovation, and export product quality: What is the role of greenwashing?. Int. Rev. Fin. Anal. 83, 102311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102311 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bothongo, K. & Kinyar, A. Factors associated with the adoption of eco-innovation and its effect on environmental performance in the US household cleaning sector. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 210, 123898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123898 (2025).
Google Scholar
Guo, B., Feng, Y. & Wang, X. The effect of environmental information disclosure on carbon emission. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 33(2), 1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/173106 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lin, B. Q. & Mar, Y. Green technology innovations, urban innovation environment and CO2 emission reduction in China:fresh evidence from a partially linear functional-coefficient panel model. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Ch. 176, 121434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121434 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wu, F., Hu, Y. & Shen, M. The color of FinTech: FinTech and corporate green transformation in China. Int. Rev. Fin. Anal. 94, 103254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103254 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ahmad, N., Nguyen, D. K. & Tian, X.-L. Assessing the impact of the sharing economy and technological innovation on sustainable development: An empirical investigation of the United Kingdom. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Ch. 209, 123743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123743 (2024).
Google Scholar
Feng, L., Chen, H., Bilan, Y., Khan, S. & Zhan, W. Green innovation: The role of government subsidies under the system of digital finance -based on a zero-inflated negative binomial model. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 26(11), 29621–29642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04856-3 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sinha, A., Sengupta, T. & Alvarado, R. Interplay between technological innovation and environmental quality: Formulating the SDG policies for next 11 economies. J. Clean. Prod. 242, 118549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118549 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yin, Z. H. & Zeng, W. P. Path to sustainable development: Can industrial intelligence and technological innovation balance economic growth and environmental quality in China?. Sustain. Dev. 32(5), 4486–4504. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2918 (2024).
Google Scholar
Braungardt, S., Elsland, R. & Eichhammer, W. The environmental impact of eco-innovations: The case of EU residential electricity use. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 18(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-015-0129-y (2016).
Google Scholar
TöbelmannWendler, D. T. The impact of environmental innovation on carbon dioxide emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 244, 118787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118787 (2020).
Google Scholar
Andrew, A. A., Adebayo, T. S., Lasisi, T. T. & Muoneke, O. B. Moderating roles of technological innovation and economic complexity in financial development-environmental quality nexus of the BRICS economies. Technol. Soc. 78, 102581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102581 (2024).
Google Scholar
Song, M., Wang, S. & Zhang, H. Could environmental regulation and R&D tax incentives affect green product innovation?. J. Clean. Prod. 258, 120849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120849 (2020).
Google Scholar
Xu, Q., Zhong, M. & Cao, M. Does digital investment affect carbon efficiency? Spatial effect and mechanism discussion. Sci. Total Environ. 827, 154321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154321 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Yao, Z. & Zhong, K. Do environmental regulations of carbon emissions and air pollution foster green technology innovation: Evidence from China’s prefecture-level cities. J. Clean. Prod. 350, 131537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131537 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yang, L. & Li, Z. Technology advance and the carbon dioxide emission in China – Empirical research based on the rebound effect. Energy Policy 101, 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.020 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wu, L. et al. Estimation of China’s macro-carbon rebound effect: Method of integrating data envelopment analysis production model and sequential malmquist-luenberger index. J. Clean. Prod. 198, 1431–1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.034 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gu, W. Z. et al. Energy technological progress, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 236, 117666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117666 (2019).
Google Scholar
Pu, Z., Qian, Y. & Liu, R. Is digital technology innovation a panacea for carbon reduction?. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2024.22208 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ngepah, N. & Mwiinga, R. The impact of climate change on gender inequality in the labour market: A case study of South Africa. Sustainability https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013131 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhu, Y. & Liu, S. Nonlinear relationship between technological innovation and carbon emission: Evidence from maximal information coefficient approach. Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol. 19, 1633–1639. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctae111 (2024).
Google Scholar
Du, K. R. et al. Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Ch. 146, 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.010 (2019).
Google Scholar
Weina, D. et al. Green inventions and greenhouse gas emission dynamics: A close examination of provincial Italian data. Environ. Econ.Policy Stud. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-015-0126-1 (2016).
Google Scholar
Gao, G.-X., Li, X., Bai, Z., Wang, J. & Jiang, H. Financing a low-carbon supply chain through online peer-to-peer lending. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 71, 5044–5056. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3208828 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lu, H., Xie, Z., Liu, Y. & Xu, G. Study on the impact of regional carbon emissions on enterprise technological innovation under the background of low-carbon transformation in China. Front. Environ. Sci. 12, 1290338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1290338 (2024).
Google Scholar
Medema, S. G. The coase theorem at sixty. J. Econ. Lit. 58(4), 1045–1128. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191060 (2020).
Google Scholar
He, W., Tan, L., Liu, Z. J. & Zhang, H. Property rights protection, environmental regulation and corporate financial performance: Revisiting the Porter Hypothesis. J. Clean. Prod. 264, 121615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121615 (2020).
Google Scholar
ChenGegentanaWang, B. Y. The impact of environmental regulations on enterprise pollution emission from the perspective of “Overseeing the Government.”. Sustainability 15(14), 11311. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411311 (2023).
Google Scholar
Li, J., Gao, J. & Liao, M. Operating risk of enterprises when adopting environmental regulation: Evidence from environmental protection law in China. Econ. Anal. Policy 81, 901–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2024.01.010 (2024).
Google Scholar
Tang, H., Liu, J. & Wu, J. The impact of command-and-control environmental regulation on enterprise total factor productivity: A quasi-natural experiment based on China’s “Two Control Zone” policy. J. Clean. Prod. 254, 120011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120011 (2020).
Google Scholar
Miao, C., Fang, D., Sun, L., Luo, Q. & Yu, Q. Driving effect of technology innovation on energy utilization efficiency in strategic emerging industries. J. Clean. Prod. 170, 1177–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.09.225 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hodson, E. et al. U.S energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO2 policy: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study. Energy Econo. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2018.03.027 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rokhmawati, A. The nexus among green investment, foreign ownership, export, greenhouse gas emissions, and competitiveness. Energy Strat. Rev. 37, 100679. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESR.2021.100679 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ganda, F. The interplay between technological innovation, financial development, energy consumption and natural resource rents in the BRICS economies: Evidence from GMM panel VAR. Energy Strateg. Rev. 51, 101267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101267 (2024).
Google Scholar
Guo, L. & Wang, Y. How does government environmental regulation “unlock” carbon emission effect?-evidence from China. Ch. J. Popul. Resour. Environ. 16(3), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10042857.2018.1496703 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chen, Z., Kahn, M. E., Liu, Y. & Wang, Z. The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 88, 468–485 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chen, S. Y. & Chen, D. K. Haze pollution, government governance and high quality economic development. Econ. Res. 53(02), 20–34 (2018) (In Chinese).
Google Scholar
Lin, S., Zhou, Z., Hu, X., Chen, S. & Huang, J. How can urban economic complexity promote green economic growth in China? The perspective of green technology innovation and industrial structure upgrading. J. Clean. Prod. 450, 141807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141807 (2024).
Google Scholar
Doda, B. et al. Are corporate carbon management practices reducing corporate carbon emissions?. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manage. 23(5), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1369 (2016).
Google Scholar
Haque, F. & Ntim, C. G. Do corporate sustainability initiatives improve corporate carbon performance? Evidence from European firms. Bus. Strat. Environ. 31(7), 3318–3334 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chen, P. Y. Relationship between the digital economy, resource allocation and corporate carbon emission intensity: New evidence from listed Chinese companies. Environ. Res. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ac7ea3 (2022).
Google Scholar
Andrews, D. W. K. & Lu, B. Consistent model and moment selection procedures for GMM estimation with application to dynamic panel data models. J. Econo. 101(1), 123–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(00)00077-4 (2001).
Google Scholar